these are just 3 of the milder smokes that I've always wanted to try and never had a chance too. If anyone wants to get rid of some then my email is in profile
Originally posted by Martin_The_Novice: I'm waiting, you pu--ies.
Posts: 1724 | Location: Another Forum | Registered: September 23, 2004
Hey bud, I'll help you out on the Nat Shermans. I'll send out a fiver of the Host selection Hunter (corona size) to you within the next couple of days. As for the others, I've tried them and don't care for them, though I think I've seen one of the other regs smoking the Royal Jamaica's.
Mike
"Eating and sleeping are the only activities that should be allowed to interrupt a man's enjoyment of his cigar." Mark Twain
When I read the title of this post I wanted to yack. I thought you were looking for those cigars to send to someone you didn't like.
The above brands have got to be some of the worst flavorwise. The order you listed them in is about the order of their quality, with the Nats being the least likely to elicit the gag reflex. I have smoked them all and still can't figure out why people enjoy them.
Stick with Gispert for a mild smoke or given the wretchedness of the above choices, this is the rare occasion I'd reccomend Macadoodoo.
The Nat Sherman Host and Metropolitan selections are some of the best CS wrapper smokes for the money. Given a little aging time, they will hold their own, and are yards above the best Gispert you could stack against it. Gispert=toilet paper rolled cigar
Mike
"Eating and sleeping are the only activities that should be allowed to interrupt a man's enjoyment of his cigar." Mark Twain
