The past subjunctive (the were tense) is properly used when you describe either a condition that's contrary to fact or a hypothetical situation that does not exist. "If I were you...", or "If the President were to withdraw our troops tomorrow ...". The verb in the clause that follows must then be 'would' or 'should' (which is archaic but acceptable).
If the situation described is not contrary to fact, the verb reverts to the normal indicative was. "If she was at the dentist, then she couldn't/wouldn't have answered her cell phone".
Of course, if you weren't wondering about the grammar in your post ... I'd just ignore this, if I were you.
'Question authority. Think for yourself. Filter out the spin. Engage elected officials critically. Make them defend what they're doing in your name. Derive the truth. Speak truth to power.'
Posts: 3252 | Location: Boston | Registered: April 16, 2005
At least Jack took the time to explain the right way.
Jack is just distracted and is grasping any opportunity not to actually work.
'Question authority. Think for yourself. Filter out the spin. Engage elected officials critically. Make them defend what they're doing in your name. Derive the truth. Speak truth to power.'
Posts: 3252 | Location: Boston | Registered: April 16, 2005
