Site Map





Cigar Videos
Cigar Insider
Cuba
Moments to Remember
Golf
Back Issues


By TwitterIcon.com

Online Advertising Info


Cigar Aficionado Online    Cigar Aficionado Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Cigar Talk    Fleeting Explatives...
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Member
Picture of jagmqt
Posted
The SCOTUS recently heard an argumet on the use of swear words on television (FCC v. Fox)

You can read about it here:SCOTUS Blog

What do you think about it?

jag

This message has been edited. Last edited by: jagmqt,


quote:
We should be too big to take offense and too noble to give it. ~ Abraham Lincoln
 
Posts: 2191 | Location: Grand Rapids, MI | Registered: September 15, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of lawstudent10
Posted Hide Post
Jag: This is another case that we prepared for in my seminar class. The briefing is very interesting and the oral arguments revealing.

I'd comment, but I don't think I can provide insightful commentary right now Wink

I do think that Pacifica will be redefined, but the extent of that redefinition is yet to be determined. More later. . . .
 
Posts: 539 | Location: Blackacre | Registered: April 29, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Coriolanus
Posted Hide Post
quote:
What do you think about it? Do you think the occasional F-bomb is ok? Does the context of its use matter? Does the number of times it is used matter?

Are there certain words that are more acceptable than others?


Programming after a certain time of day would not create problems. Chances are that if you are a parent who keeps young kids up until 11 every night, you probably cuss around them anyway.

Europeans have lax standards (relative to us) on what is shown on television and they don't seem too maladjusted. Maybe it's because they don't park their kids in front of it all day.

FYI: expletives. I saw you going after someone on another thread about this. Wink
 
Posts: 9942 | Registered: May 02, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Coriolanus
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jagmqt:
quote:
Originally posted by Coriolanus:
FYI: expletives. I saw you going after someone on another thread about this. Wink


If it was the "bawdy humor" comment, I got it from the blog, where they quote Justice Scalia as saying “Bawdy jokes are OK, if they’re really good!”...Someone finally recognized cross-thread commenting... Wink


No, it was in your escalating war over the word "competent."

quote:
Europe makes an interesting comarison...I wonder how long it would take this country to adjust if we suddenly adopted to the standards overseas. I'm quite certain we'd act like a bunch of juveniles the first time we saw a bare breast and heard the f-word during a soap opera or on Boston Legal...but do you think we'd eventually mature to that type of content?


There will always be a group of people in this country who are incredibly conservative and puritanical. I imagine that they would be the loudest opposition.

As has been said by many filmmakers, it is odd how we couldn't care less about children seeing violence, but if they see anything sexual or hear a bad word we freak out. I don't know why we have such a high tolerance for violence on television.
 
Posts: 9942 | Registered: May 02, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
QM
Member
Picture of QM
Posted Hide Post
There is a difference between profanity and swearing.

In profanity we take sexual & bodily functions, transform into four letter words that have the rare property of being able to function as verb, noun, adjective and adverb.
We can have conversations where every second or third word is a four letter word.

But swear words involve blasphemy against a religious concept. This can be very offensive to many. Yet it can be quite benign to others.


QM
Quality does not occur by chance. It is the result of intelligent activities.
 
Posts: 8749 | Location: Cigar land | Registered: March 10, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Jack White
Posted Hide Post
I think a big part of the issue is just how responsible should broadcasters be held for unplanned and unanticipated "slips of the tongue" by a participant in the context of a live telecast -- the so-called "fleeting expletive" -- in a time slot in which children would be expected to be part of the audience.

That potential is a big reason for God giving us the technology for a seven-second delay and the kill button. And, for that matter, cable, where the FCC has no jurisdiction.


'Question authority. Think for yourself. Filter out the spin. Engage elected officials critically. Make them defend what they're doing in your name. Derive the truth. Speak truth to power.'
 
Posts: 4544 | Location: Boston | Registered: April 16, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
TSF
Member
Picture of TSF
Posted Hide Post
As long as the batteries in the remote are good I'm indifferent to the whole thing.

Of course, all my children are 18+ now.
 
Posts: 1315 | Location: Georgia, USA | Registered: January 18, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
In our endless pursuit of finding someone else to blame, the day will come when a network is sued (successfully) over a teen pregnancy or rape or some such.

If you can hold RJR responsible, it's not a huge leap, especially given study after study showing what is seen & heard on TV has a definite effect on behavior.

If you're a network and you run a live show not on a delay, you're asking for trouble.


___

Warm weather. Salt air. Cold beer. Big Cigar.
 
Posts: 621 | Location: Charlotte, NC, USA | Registered: February 16, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community  
 

Cigar Aficionado Online    Cigar Aficionado Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Cigar Talk    Fleeting Explatives...

© Cigar Aficionado Online 2005