I smoked a May 04 Monte #2 that a friend gave to me on Sunday and it seemed like the fill was a little softer than usual. It smoked excellent, as usual. The taste, draw, wrapper color, was the same as the Oct 02's that I have in my humidor.
Has anyone else had this experience on 2004, #2's?
############################## "Time is a thief, it will steal your tomorrows. So, smoke a cigar today." --BB King (and a little Paleto)
Posts: 519 | Location: A Guarda, España | Registered: May 03, 2002
I've heard much criticism of recent production cigars being underfilled. Quite possible. No personal experiences really to speak from really as any new full boxes I have, have been laid down for aging.
Posts: 109 | Location: Bay Area, CA, USA | Registered: January 13, 2004
I get the Sopranos on regular broadcast television "up here". So it is a year or more later than the HBO first run.
So Tony was in that horse stable petting that sedated horse. Its raining buckets. The mascot goat walks in. Its a wood structure & the floor is covered in straw. Tony pulls out an MC2. The scene fades away and we never see the smoke being lit.
Was that an MC2 or what?
QM Quality does not occur by chance. It is the result of intelligent activities.
Posts: 7977 | Location: Cigar land | Registered: March 10, 2003
I guess it was just that I hadn't smoked one in so long. I look at them in my humi and rotate them and all, but I never find the time to smoke one...of mine. Everything feels and tastes different when gifted.
############################## "Time is a thief, it will steal your tomorrows. So, smoke a cigar today." --BB King (and a little Paleto)
Posts: 519 | Location: A Guarda, España | Registered: May 03, 2002
only issue i have had is burn problems, but as grond said, yum yum...want a cigar something awful right now, but the only sticks i got left are too expensive to smoke after a 12 pack or two.
Posts: 491 | Location: Ithaca, NY | Registered: April 19, 2004