What 2 of these would you reccomend if you could only select 2 of the 4. I like mild to boderline bold cigars. Your help will be appreciated on me deciding what route to go ...
Cuban versions
Sancho Panza Corona Partagas Corona Punch Corona Montecristo Number 3
Posts: 244 | Location: Pennsylvania | Registered: January 27, 2007
Splittin' the special with some one? Split the boxes too, and try 'em all!
"I contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle." -Winston Churchill
For myself the Punch and the Partagas. Every now and again when I think my head is to far up my own arrse I get some Partagas to remind myself what Cubans are all about.
Tw@t No 2
Posts: 267 | Location: UK. | Registered: October 20, 2002
Glad you asked Ruger. I've been lurking around that aforementioned forum for some time and have yet to do business with them. Good to see others have had positive experiences.
"I have a lot of growing up to do. I realized that the other day in my fort." Zach Galifianakis
I like them all. Monte 3's are very solid and flavorful smokes. Partagas Coronas are nice for a bit of "in your face" flavor and aroma. Punch Coronas are excellent with a few years of age. And Sancho Panza Coronas are a very unique, change of pace cigar. Don't think you could go wrong with any of them...it just depends on what you're looking for.
Better beautiful than perfect
Posts: 947 | Location: AZ | Registered: September 11, 2005
