(6.25 x 52) This was my second time trying the C.A.O. Gold Torpedo. The first one I had was a great mild smoke and a FAVORITE. On the second smoke I thought it was mild to medium in body, it had a nice draw to it, and it burned even the entire time. The taste was very smooth but lacked a little in flavor compared to the first one I had. Worth trying and a FAVORITE.

whaat?

LMAO!!!

I am confused by the two above comments. I would like to hear the opinions of a couple other experienced cigar enthusiasts.

I'm not a fan of anything CAO makes except maybe the brazilia. This cigar to me is nowhere near the likes of ashton, avo, perdomo, padilla, or torano's shade wrapped offerings. But taste being subjective you should try them. They aren't as mild as ashton classics or cabinets but they aren't as lively as the casa torano. In contrast, this cigar has a bit of a muddy flavor and the finish has a dry almost salty quality to it. That is compared to your normal creamy nutty CS cigar.

I have only smoked one of these, and it was, in fact, mild, but pleasant. That was a lot of commas for a short sentence.

Pmpimbura,

Its funny you say that you don't like anything C.A.O. makes. Because C.A.O. dosen't make any of there cigars. Torano, Perdomo, and La Aurora make all the C.A.O.s and you say they don't match up to Torano and Perdomo. Whaat?

C.A.O. doesn't make any of THEIR own cigars either. He's saying the blends don't match up and that C.A.O.'s are overpriced, way over hyped pieces of utter crapola.

Whaat???

How are C.A.O.s overpriced but Perdomos are not? You guys don't make any sense.

quote:

Originally posted by Aaron Funk:
I am confused by the two above comments. I would like to hear the opinions of a couple other experienced cigar enthusiasts.

The short end of it is that your better off firein up a dried out sh*t from your yard than one of these puppies. Old Wu had prolly had an opium hit before he reviewed this bad boy.

coronawu,what you said!